Is Obama preparing an attack on the American people?

In an unprecedented move this week, President Obama fired two of the nations top military chiefs.

PRESIDENT OBAMA FIRES HIGH RANKING NUCLEAR CHIEFS

While his administration continues to spend large sums of money blockading national monuments, and ‘inflicting as much pain as possible’ on the American people during the supposed ‘government shutdown’ he has been busy changing people around in the military.

Also this week Barack Obama’s approval rating has plummeted to 37%, which is the lowest George Bush Jr polled during his two terms in office. With three more years left until the end of his presidency. Is Barack Obama planning to stage a false flag attack on the American people to get them to unite behind him? Or is he planning on using his own private Army, the DHS with its billion rounds of hollow point ammunition to stage a conflict against the American people?

Another thing that happened recently is the signing on the UN small arms treaty. Is Obama planning on allowing the UN onto our soil to aid in the confiscation of our firearms? Is Barack Obama’s firing of top military officials an attempt to promote officers who are more in line with his statist ambitions?

All of this is very disturbing, especially from a president who is already hugely unpopular, who is already being called for impeachment, who is already defying the constitution, and who openly calls for pain on the american people so that he can get his disastrous healthcare bill funded despite resentment from an overwhelming majority of the American people.

Americans are already starting to openly rebel against the President and his draconian policies. The tearing down of his ‘barrycades’ earlier today is a clear indication that we the people will not be stopped, and that we are tired of his attempts to bury this nation.

So what is Obama preparing to do? Is he planning a false flag attack? Or a confiscation of our firearms; which would inevitably end up in civil war? What do you think?

False flags are brewing

The up and coming war with Syria is not popular with the American people. Less than 9% of the country want’s to start another Middle-Eastern war.

While going to war without congressional approval is illegal and an impeachable offence, President Obama is already planning an all out attack.

In order to draw more support for the war, watch out for false flag attacks.

Such attacks could be cyber attacks, and even the sinking of one of our ships. As for the chemical attack, there are now many sources that say that the rebels did it and not Assad.

Here are some articles worth viewing:

Al Qaeda rebels used sarin nerve gas:

http://intellihub.com/2013/08/28/al-qaeda-rebels-used-sarin-nerve-gas-syria-attack/

China hit by ‘biggest ever’ cyber attack:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23851041

US web attacks skyrocket ahead of Middle East action:

http://investmentwatchblog.com/u-s-web-attacks-skyrocket-ahead-of-mid-east-action-81-above-normal-real-time-heat-map/

Massive transport of tanks in New Orleans:

http://intellihub.com/2013/08/27/massive-transport-of-tanks-in-new-orleans/

SAS hunting Syrian missiles as allies prepare for bombing blitz:

http://stratrisks.com/geostrat/15054

The Pretext to wage war on Syria – another false flag operation – history repeating itself:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/pretext-to-wage-war-on-syria-another-false-flag-operation-history-repeating-itself/5347176?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pretext-to-wage-war-on-syria-another-false-flag-operation-history-repeating-itself

And here are 22 reasons why going to war with Syria is a bad idea:

22 Reasons Why Starting World War 3 In The Middle East Is A Really Bad Idea

August 28, 2013

Print Version

Source: Michael Snyder, Guest Post

While most of the country is obsessing over Miley Cyrus, the Obama administration is preparing a military attack against Syria which has the potential of starting World War 3. In fact, it is being reported that cruise missile strikes could begin “as early as Thursday”. The Obama administration is pledging that the strikes will be “limited”, but what happens when the Syrians fight back? What happens if they sink a U.S. naval vessel or they have agents start hitting targets inside the United States? Then we would have a full-blown war on our hands. And what happens if the Syrians decide to retaliate by hitting Israel? If Syrian missiles start raining down on Tel Aviv, Israel will be extremely tempted to absolutely flatten Damascus, and they are more than capable of doing precisely that. And of course Hezbollah and Iran are not likely to just sit idly by as their close ally Syria is battered into oblivion. We are looking at a scenario where the entire Middle East could be set aflame, and that might only be just the beginning. Russia and China are sternly warning the U.S. government not to get involved in Syria, and by starting a war with Syria we will do an extraordinary amount of damage to our relationships with those two global superpowers. Could this be the beginning of a chain of events that could eventually lead to a massive global conflict with Russia and China on one side and the United States on the other? Of course it will not happen immediately, but I fear that what is happening now is setting the stage for some really bad things. The following are 22 reasons why starting World War 3 in the Middle East is a really bad idea…

#1 The American people are overwhelmingly against going to war with Syria…

Americans strongly oppose U.S. intervention in Syria’s civil war and believe Washington should stay out of the conflict even if reports that Syria’s government used deadly chemicals to attack civilians are confirmed, a Reuters/Ipsos poll says.

About 60 percent of Americans surveyed said the United States should not intervene in Syria’s civil war, while just 9 percent thought President Barack Obama should act.

#2 At this point, a war in Syria is even more unpopular with the American people than Congress is.

#3 The Obama administration has not gotten approval to go to war with Syria from Congress as the U.S. Constitution requires.

#4 The United States does not have the approval of the United Nations to attack Syria and it is not going to be getting it.

#5 Syria has said that it will use “all means available” to defend itself if the United States attacks. Would that include terror attacks in the United States itself?

#6 Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem made the following statement on Tuesday…

“We have two options: either to surrender, or to defend ourselves with the means at our disposal. The second choice is the best: we will defend ourselves”

#7 Russia has just sent their most advanced anti-ship missiles to Syria. What do you think would happen if images of sinking U.S. naval vessels were to come flashing across our television screens?

#8 When the United States attacks Syria, there is a very good chance that Syria will attack Israel. Just check out what one Syrian official said recently…

A member of the Syrian Ba’ath national council Halef al-Muftah, until recently the Syrian propaganda minister’s aide, said on Monday that Damascus views Israel as “behind the aggression and therefore it will come under fire” should Syria be attacked by the United States.

In an interview for the American radio station Sawa in Arabic, President Bashar Assad’s fellow party member said: “We have strategic weapons and we can retaliate. Essentially, the strategic weapons are aimed at Israel.”

Al-Muftah stressed that the US’s threats will not influence the Syrain regime and added that “If the US or Israel err through aggression and exploit the chemical issue, the region will go up in endless flames, affecting not only the area’s security, but the world’s.”

#9 If Syria attacks Israel, the consequences could be absolutely catastrophic. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is promising that any attack will be responded to “forcefully”…

“We are not a party to this civil war in Syria but if we identify any attempt to attack us we will respond and we will respond forcefully”

#10 Hezbollah will likely do whatever it can to fight for the survival of the Assad regime. That could include striking targets inside both the United States and Israel.

#11 Iran’s closest ally is Syria. Will Iran sit idly by as their closest ally is removed from the chessboard?

#12 Starting a war with Syria will cause significant damage to our relationship with Russia. On Tuesday, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said that the West is acting like a “monkey with a hand grenade”.

#13 Starting a war with Syria will cause significant damage to our relationship with China. And what will happen if the Chinese decide to start dumping the massive amount of U.S. debt that it is holding? Interest rates would absolutely skyrocket and we would rapidly be facing a nightmare scenario.

#14 Dr. Jerome Corsi and Walid Shoebat have compiled some startling evidence that it was actually the Syrian rebels that the U.S. is supporting that were responsible for the chemical weapons attack that is being used as justification to go to war with Syria…

With the assistance of former PLO member and native Arabic-speaker Walid Shoebat, WND has assembled evidence from various Middle Eastern sources that cast doubt on Obama administration claims the Assad government is responsible for last week’s attack.

You can examine the evidence for yourself right here.

#15 As Pat Buchanan recently noted, it would have made absolutely no sense for the Assad regime to use chemical weapons on defenseless women and children. The only people who would benefit from such an attack would be the rebels…

The basic question that needs to be asked about this horrific attack on civilians, which appears to be gas related, is: Cui bono?

To whose benefit would the use of nerve gas on Syrian women and children redound? Certainly not Assad’s, as we can see from the furor and threats against him that the use of gas has produced.

The sole beneficiary of this apparent use of poison gas against civilians in rebel-held territory appears to be the rebels, who have long sought to have us come in and fight their war.

#16 If the Saudis really want to topple the Assad regime, they should do it themselves. They should not expect the United States to do their dirty work for them.

#17 A former commander of U.S. Central Command has said that a U.S. attack on Syria would result in “a full-throated, very, very serious war”.

#18 A war in the Middle East will be bad for the financial markets. The Dow was down about 170 points today and concern about war with Syria was the primary reason.

#19 A war in the Middle East will cause the price of oil to go up. On Tuesday, the price of U.S. oil rose to about $109 a barrel.

#20 There is no way in the world that the U.S. government should be backing the Syrian rebels. As I discussed a few days ago, the rebels have pledged loyalty to al-Qaeda, they have beheaded numerous Christians and they have massacred entire Christian villages. If the U.S. government helps these lunatics take power in Syria it will be a complete and utter disaster.

#21 A lot of innocent civilians inside Syria will end up getting killed. Already, a lot of Syrians are expressing concern about what “foreign intervention” will mean for them and their families…

“I’ve always been a supporter of foreign intervention, but now that it seems like a reality, I’ve been worrying that my family could be hurt or killed,” said one woman, Zaina, who opposes Assad. “I’m afraid of a military strike now.”

“The big fear is that they’ll make the same mistakes they made in Libya and Iraq,” said Ziyad, a man in his 50s. “They’ll hit civilian targets, and then they’ll cry that it was by mistake, but we’ll get killed in the thousands.”

#22 If the U.S. government insists on going to war with Syria without the approval of the American people, the U.S. Congress or the United Nations, we are going to lose a lot of friends and a lot of credibility around the globe. It truly is a sad day when Russia looks like “the good guys” and we look like “the bad guys”.

What good could possibly come out of getting involved in Syria? As I wrote about the other day, the “rebels” that Obama is backing are rabidly anti-Christian, rabidly anti-Israel and rabidly anti-western. If they take control of Syria, that nation will be far more unstable and far more of a hotbed for terrorism than it is now.

And the downside of getting involved in Syria is absolutely enormous. Syria, Iran and Hezbollah all have agents inside this country, and if they decide to start blowing stuff up that will wake up the American people to the horror of war really quick. And by attacking Syria, the United States could cause a major regional war to erupt in the Middle East which could eventually lead to World War 3.

I don’t know about you, but I think that starting World War 3 in the Middle East is a really bad idea.

Let us hope that cooler heads prevail before things spin totally out of control.

Remember, look sharp, keep focused, look beyond the glare of the mainstream media, and tell you friends about what you’ve found. Pass along the articles from alternative media outlets. Get the message out there. Let others know that this is a bad idea.

You might sound like a kook for a few days, but if it stops a thermo-nuclear war from occurring, I think that’s worth it, don’t you?

What Really Happened; and false flags

For a while now I have mentioned the site www.whatreallyhappened.com

I have mentioned the site because Mike Rivero does a great job at displaying hundreds of articles a day from various alternative news sites, that you won’t see on the ‘mainstream media’. Recently, viewings of such channels as CNN have plummeted so far that ‘what really happened’ has over taken over in number of viewers/readers.

Also, you have seen me mention false flags and Zionism.

I now believe that 9/11 was a false flag attack, for many reasons. And that there are, and have been many false flag attacks throughout history.

The Olympics, while being held not too far from where I was born, may well be a major distraction, and become a false flag event. Never in my life have I seen Britain so militarized for any event.

Does it not seem odd that our presidential candidates always go to Israel before becoming president?

All the events that are going on right now, seem to be adding up. I think people such as Glenn Beck, Alex Jones and others all have peices of the puzzle, but that they don’t completely add up. I think Mike Rivero is closer than anyone right now to understanding ‘what really happened’.

I have studied the American Revolution and the declaration of independence, and I have studied the ‘tea party’ groups and ‘occupy wall street’ groups. It seems a little too convienient that one ‘side’ is declared to be ‘conservative’ and the other ‘side’ declared to be ‘liberal’. I agree with the Tea Party groups that we are taxed too much and that government has too much control. But I also agree with the Occupiers that there are criminals in some of the banks and in government. There are members of the 1% who do need to be brought to justice. But I have no problem with capitalism, I do not want some kind of socialist society. Equally, I’m not interested in serving in the military or praising God every sunday, as many of the Tea Party group advocate. I think what both groups are really grasping at; is that they want government off their backs and want to be free to create their dreams again. I believe that sooner (hopefully with the election of Ron Paul) or later, there will be another revolution in this country. Between the individualists and the collectivists.

I would say, check your premise. What are you actually supporting? Are you part of a collective, or a band of individuals, working together for mutual advantage?

And as for the media and current going’s on, I would say, as Sherlock Holmes did; “when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth”

Here are a few articles to keep you busy:

The Jews do control the media

Romney courts donors

70 Million voters ignored

London Olympics – False Flag, Diversion or Prelude?

These are but a blip of information of what is going on right now. Take each with a pinch of salt, and try to keep an open mind. An emotional electorate will elect anyone, and allow anything to happen.

Oh, and remember what I said about WWIII?

Yeah, check these two articles out:

Chinese Destroyer Enters Suez Canal

Iran, Syria, Russia, China plan naval drill in Mediterranean

The world is waking up, and it’s doing so in the form of blogs like these (perhaps that’s why so many members of congress wanted PIPA and SOPA to go through, to silence the masses)

The Joker: another false flag?

The dust has settled a little from the tragic event in Colorado on early Friday morning.

What doesn’t add up is how calm the defendant is, and how spaced out he is. He looks like he’s under hypnosis or on drugs or something.

Also; where did he get tear gas from?

How did he manage to shoot 71 people with a semi automatic weapon, in just 1 1/2 minutes?

And how was his adrenaline not in overdrive when the police arrive?

Also, all the evidence is now destroyed at his apartment because of the controlled explosions.

And it seems that he already has a layer of lawyers.

And one more thing; why would a successful PhD student just drop out and go and do this? He doesn’t look angry, he just looks possessed.

A couple of gun owners clubs say that he had a guttural sounding voice over the phone, that sounds like someone who is possessed.

Why did the news reports say there were multiple shooters, then immediately turn around and say there was only one?

All of this is too strange and too neat to simply gloss over and say he was just psycho. I now think there was more to it.

When you consider that the UN small arms treaty is being ready to be signed soon, it seems a little too convenient to have a mass murder occur in one of the strongest supporting nation’s of firearms, right before the treaty is signed.

In other news, the only other things we heard over the weekend from the mainstream news channels, was the escalation of violence in Syria, and the prime minister of Israel; Benjamin Netanyahoo; blaming Iran immediately after the bombing in Belarus, when no evidence was even gathered, and Iran denied having anything to do with it.

When you take into consideration that the Olympics is starting in a few days in what is now highly militarized London, and the security was provided by an Israeli owned security company (which failed to hire enough security guards) everything that is going on right now seems mighty fishy.

Over the last few months I have been doing a lot of research into what has gone on in the US and the rest of the world in the last couple of decades and I can see many sickening coincidences.

It seems that 9/11 was a false flag event also, and that Israel is behind a lot of the bad things going on in the world and particularly the middle east right now. To be specific, it is the extremist faction in Israel called the Zionists, who seem to be behind everything.

Now I’m no conspiracy nut, but when you do enough research and use an analytical mindset, it isn’t hard to see the truth.

Stay vigilant, keep an eye on the mainstream news, but keep reading independent news articles and blogs. I sense a bigger plot about to happen.