False flags are brewing

The up and coming war with Syria is not popular with the American people. Less than 9% of the country want’s to start another Middle-Eastern war.

While going to war without congressional approval is illegal and an impeachable offence, President Obama is already planning an all out attack.

war ships

In order to draw more support for the war, watch out for false flag attacks.

Such attacks could be cyber attacks, and even the sinking of one of our ships. As for the chemical attack, there are now many sources that say that the rebels did it and not Assad.

Here are some articles worth viewing:

Al Qaeda rebels used sarin nerve gas:

http://intellihub.com/2013/08/28/al-qaeda-rebels-used-sarin-nerve-gas-syria-attack/

China hit by ‘biggest ever’ cyber attack:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-23851041

US web attacks skyrocket ahead of Middle East action:

http://investmentwatchblog.com/u-s-web-attacks-skyrocket-ahead-of-mid-east-action-81-above-normal-real-time-heat-map/

Massive transport of tanks in New Orleans:

http://intellihub.com/2013/08/27/massive-transport-of-tanks-in-new-orleans/

SAS hunting Syrian missiles as allies prepare for bombing blitz:

http://stratrisks.com/geostrat/15054

The Pretext to wage war on Syria – another false flag operation – history repeating itself:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/pretext-to-wage-war-on-syria-another-false-flag-operation-history-repeating-itself/5347176?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=pretext-to-wage-war-on-syria-another-false-flag-operation-history-repeating-itself

And here are 22 reasons why going to war with Syria is a bad idea:

Tomahawk cruise missile

While most of the country is obsessing over Miley Cyrus, the Obama administration is preparing a military attack against Syria which has the potential of starting World War 3.  In fact, it is being reported that cruise missile strikes could begin “as early as Thursday”.  The Obama administration is pledging that the strikes will be “limited”, but what happens when the Syrians fight back?  What happens if they sink a U.S. naval vessel or they have agents start hitting targets inside the United States?  Then we would have a full-blown war on our hands.  And what happens if the Syrians decide to retaliate by hitting Israel?  If Syrian missiles start raining down on Tel Aviv, Israel will be extremely tempted to absolutely flatten Damascus, and they are more than capable of doing precisely that.  And of course Hezbollah and Iran are not likely to just sit idly by as their close ally Syria is battered into oblivion.  We are looking at a scenario where the entire Middle East could be set aflame, and that might only be just the beginning.  Russia and China are sternly warning the U.S. government not to get involved in Syria, and by starting a war with Syria we will do an extraordinary amount of damage to our relationships with those two global superpowers.  Could this be the beginning of a chain of events that could eventually lead to a massive global conflict with Russia and China on one side and the United States on the other?  Of course it will not happen immediately, but I fear that what is happening now is setting the stage for some really bad things.  The following are 22 reasons why starting World War 3 in the Middle East is a really bad idea…

#1 The American people are overwhelmingly against going to war with Syria…

Americans strongly oppose U.S. intervention in Syria’s civil war and believe Washington should stay out of the conflict even if reports that Syria’s government used deadly chemicals to attack civilians are confirmed, a Reuters/Ipsos poll says.

About 60 percent of Americans surveyed said the United States should not intervene in Syria’s civil war, while just 9 percent thought President Barack Obama should act.

#2 At this point, a war in Syria is even more unpopular with the American people than Congress is.

#3 The Obama administration has not gotten approval to go to war with Syria from Congress as the U.S. Constitution requires.

#4 The United States does not have the approval of the United Nations to attack Syria and it is not going to be getting it.

#5 Syria has said that it will use “all means available” to defend itself if the United States attacks.  Would that include terror attacks in the United States itself?

#6 Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem made the following statement on Tuesday…

“We have two options: either to surrender, or to defend ourselves with the means at our disposal. The second choice is the best: we will defend ourselves”

#7 Russia has just sent their most advanced anti-ship missiles to Syria.  What do you think would happen if images of sinking U.S. naval vessels were to come flashing across our television screens?

#8 When the United States attacks Syria, there is a very good chance that Syria will attack Israel.  Just check out what one Syrian official said recently…

A member of the Syrian Ba’ath national council Halef al-Muftah, until recently the Syrian propaganda minister’s aide, said on Monday that Damascus views Israel as “behind the aggression and therefore it will come under fire” should Syria be attacked by the United States.

In an interview for the American radio station Sawa in Arabic, President Bashar Assad’s fellow party member said: “We have strategic weapons and we can retaliate. Essentially, the strategic weapons are aimed at Israel.”

Al-Muftah stressed that the US’s threats will not influence the Syrain regime and added that “If the US or Israel err through aggression and exploit the chemical issue, the region will go up in endless flames, affecting not only the area’s security, but the world’s.”

#9 If Syria attacks Israel, the consequences could be absolutely catastrophic.  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is promising that any attack will be responded to “forcefully”…

“We are not a party to this civil war in Syria but if we identify any attempt to attack us we will respond and we will respond forcefully”

#10 Hezbollah will likely do whatever it can to fight for the survival of the Assad regime.  That could include striking targets inside both the United States and Israel.

#11 Iran’s closest ally is Syria.  Will Iran sit idly by as their closest ally is removed from the chessboard?

#12 Starting a war with Syria will cause significant damage to our relationship with Russia.  On Tuesday, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said that the West is acting like a “monkey with a hand grenade”.

#13 Starting a war with Syria will cause significant damage to our relationship with China.  And what will happen if the Chinese decide to start dumping the massive amount of U.S. debt that it is holding?  Interest rates would absolutely skyrocket and we would rapidly be facing a nightmare scenario.

#14 Dr. Jerome Corsi and Walid Shoebat have compiled some startling evidence that it was actually the Syrian rebels that the U.S. is supporting that were responsible for the chemical weapons attack that is being used as justification to go to war with Syria…

With the assistance of former PLO member and native Arabic-speaker Walid Shoebat, WND has assembled evidence from various Middle Eastern sources that cast doubt on Obama administration claims the Assad government is responsible for last week’s attack.

You can examine the evidence for yourself right here.

#15 As Pat Buchanan recently noted, it would have made absolutely no sense for the Assad regime to use chemical weapons on defenseless women and children.  The only people who would benefit from such an attack would be the rebels…

The basic question that needs to be asked about this horrific attack on civilians, which appears to be gas related, is: Cui bono?

To whose benefit would the use of nerve gas on Syrian women and children redound? Certainly not Assad’s, as we can see from the furor and threats against him that the use of gas has produced.

The sole beneficiary of this apparent use of poison gas against civilians in rebel-held territory appears to be the rebels, who have long sought to have us come in and fight their war.

#16 If the Saudis really want to topple the Assad regime, they should do it themselves.  They should not expect the United States to do their dirty work for them.

#17 A former commander of U.S. Central Command has said that a U.S. attack on Syria would result in “a full-throated, very, very serious war”.

#18 A war in the Middle East will be bad for the financial markets.  The Dow was down about 170 points today and concern about war with Syria was the primary reason.

#19 A war in the Middle East will cause the price of oil to go up.  On Tuesday, the price of U.S. oil rose to about $109 a barrel.

#20 There is no way in the world that the U.S. government should be backing the Syrian rebels.  As I discussed a few days ago, the rebels have pledged loyalty to al-Qaeda, they have beheaded numerous Christians and they have massacred entire Christian villages.  If the U.S. government helps these lunatics take power in Syria it will be a complete and utter disaster.

#21 A lot of innocent civilians inside Syria will end up getting killed.  Already, a lot of Syrians are expressing concern about what “foreign intervention” will mean for them and their families…

“I’ve always been a supporter of foreign intervention, but now that it seems like a reality, I’ve been worrying that my family could be hurt or killed,” said one woman, Zaina, who opposes Assad. “I’m afraid of a military strike now.”

“The big fear is that they’ll make the same mistakes they made in Libya and Iraq,” said Ziyad, a man in his 50s. “They’ll hit civilian targets, and then they’ll cry that it was by mistake, but we’ll get killed in the thousands.”

#22 If the U.S. government insists on going to war with Syria without the approval of the American people, the U.S. Congress or the United Nations, we are going to lose a lot of friends and a lot of credibility around the globe.  It truly is a sad day when Russia looks like “the good guys” and we look like “the bad guys”.

What good could possibly come out of getting involved in Syria?  As I wrote about the other day, the “rebels” that Obama is backing are rabidly anti-Christian, rabidly anti-Israel and rabidly anti-western.  If they take control of Syria, that nation will be far more unstable and far more of a hotbed for terrorism than it is now.

And the downside of getting involved in Syria is absolutely enormous.  Syria, Iran and Hezbollah all have agents inside this country, and if they decide to start blowing stuff up that will wake up the American people to the horror of war really quick.  And by attacking Syria, the United States could cause a major regional war to erupt in the Middle East which could eventually lead to World War 3.

I don’t know about you, but I think that starting World War 3 in the Middle East is a really bad idea.

Let us hope that cooler heads prevail before things spin totally out of control.

Remember, look sharp, keep focused, look beyond the glare of the mainstream media, and tell you friends about what you’ve found. Pass along the articles from alternative media outlets. Get the message out there. Let others know that this is a bad idea.

missiles

You might sound like a kook for a few days, but if it stops a thermo-nuclear war from occurring, I think that’s worth it, don’t you?

Today, from the desk of Dr. Ron Paul: [Please share widely]

“America is over $16 trillion in debt. The “official” unemployment rate still hovers around 8%. Our federal government claims the right to spy on American citizens, indefinitely detain them, and even assassinate them without trial.

Domestic drones fly over the country for civilian surveillance. Twelve million fewer Americans voted in 2012 than in 2008, yet political pundits scratch their heads.

It’s not hard to see why, though.

To go along with endorsing a never-ending policy of bailouts, “stimulus packages,” and foreign military adventurism, the establishment of neither major party questions the assaults on Americans’ liberties I’ve named above.

As my campaign showed, the American people are fed up. Many realized heading into Tuesday that regardless of who won the presidential election, the status quo would be the real victor.

GOP leadership is now questioning why they didn’t perform better.

They’re looking at demographic changes in the United States and implying minorities can only be brought into the party by loudly advocating for abandoning what little remains of their limited government platform and endorsing more statist policies.

My presidential campaign proved that standing for freedom brings people together.

Liberty is popular – regardless of race, religion, or creed.

As long as the GOP establishment continues to not only reject the liberty message, but actively drive away the young, diverse coalition that supports those principles, it will see results similar to Tuesday’s outcome.

A renewed respect for liberty is the only way forward for the Republican Party and for our country.

I urge all my Republican colleagues to join the liberty movement in fighting for a brighter future.”

–Ron Paul

Remembering 9/11

Today marks the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.

Everyone remembers where they were the day of the attacks, what they were doing, the feelings, emotions and upsets at the tragedy that occured in front of our eyes and television sets.

I remember the shock and aftermath of the attacks. For years I believed the official story of that tragic day, with the planes smashing into the world trade center, the plumes of smoke filling the air, and the collapse of the buildings. It was only recently while researching other topics that I discovered evidence to suggest that the attacks were not as cut and dry as a handful of terrorists hijacking planes.

If you think about it, how could a man in a cave, thousands of miles away, direct a coordinated attack with people who had very little flight training, to ram three planes into three separate buildings?

During the entire cold war, the Russians, with all their technology, could not pull off an attack against us. We have a trillion dollar air defense system, and standard protocol when a plane goes off course, is to dispatch a fighter aircraft to check up on the plane and guide it back on course or shoot it down if it becomes an imminent threat. And yet; on 9/11 the air defense was told to ‘stand down’

The truth is that we are no closer to finding out what really happened on that fateful day, and to add insult to injury, the powers that be have kept a close lid on any kind of investigation into the crimes that occured leading up to and during the brutal murder of some 3000 inocent people.

I have already written two articles on the events of 9/11 and suggest you read them and watch the various videos and documentaries.

The truth about September 11th 2001?

9/11 conspiracy theories

What really happened at the pentagon? Why did the security cameras ‘blip’ before the plane flew into the building? Was it really a plane that flew in? Or was it a bomb or a cruise missile? One of my friends is a pilot and he said even the most experienced pilots would have a hard time putting a Boeing 757 into a building at low altitude and at high speed. He said that it would be impossible for a couple of inexperienced pilots who had only a few hours training to bring a plane down that low at that speed.

Think about how the towers came down. Planes are very fragile by comparison to concrete and steel buildings. Burning jet fuel does not generate enough heat to melt steel, and even with massive structural damage steel buildings do not simply implode into their own footprints.

Windsor Tower in Madrid, Spain burned for 20+ hours and never collapsed.


No steel frame structure has ever collapsed due to fire, before or after 9/11. On 9/11, three collapsed, due to “structural failure from fires”

Here is the burnt out shell of the skyscraper in Madrid after the fire:

Here is another sky scraper fully ablaze in Beijing:

The flames erupting from this building were far worse than the flames from the world trade center on 9/11 and yet the building did not collapse:

Here is an article that shows the difference between the 9/11 buildings and the Beijing skyscraper:

http://www.infowars.com/fire-consumes-wtc-7-size-skyscraper-building-does-not-collapse/

To expand the points even further, here is a video that shows controlled explosions as the tower comes down:

And how did the BBC manage to report that a building had come down while it was still standing? How did they know?

None of this adds up, unless you count it as a false flag attack.

There is a lot of information to suggest that the Mossad was behind 9/11. They have many enemies in the Middle East, but only this country has the resources to attack them. A false flag attack would give them the perfect opportunity to ‘nudge’ us into a conflict with their neighboring enemies.

Remember that the Israelis own or manipulate almost all of our mass media.

The Zionist Illuminati

Here is a huge report that covers in great detail what happened on 9/11 and makes a strong argument that the Zionists were behind it:

http://zioncrimefactory.com/israel-did-911/

When using critical thinking, when looking at all sides of the equation, when having an open mind, you often find out more than your were bargaining for. Being an open minded free thinker, I find myself on like-minded people’s websites, and can’t help but find ‘9/11 truther’ articles among the political and philisophical articles. I don’t expect you to take any of this at face value. Up until only a year or two ago, I never would have believed any of this would be possible, but the research speaks volumes for itself.

I suggest you do your own research, and draw your own conclusions. It makes me feel sick when I find evidence like this. But if we do not find the truth, if we do not hold the true culprits responsible, then they will have gotten away with murder, and they will be able to continue their crimes without hinderance. That is simply not acceptable.

I have been told that by not respecting the official story of 9/11 that I am ‘spitting on the graves’ of those who died. I do not see how my questioning of the events is ‘spitting on the graves’ of those who were murdered. In fact I would say that the quest for justice is more respectful of those who died than those who simply bury their heads in the sand and believe whatever the government tells them. The same government who used the excuse of 9/11 to start multiple wars that have consumed the lives of millions of innocent people since.

For those who I have upset with this post I would say; this post should upset you, because your emotions have been played against you to start a ‘War on Terror’ which should be more aptly named ‘War of Terror’.

Was it Al-Qaeda who flew the planes into the towers? Perhaps, but that is not what brought them down. There is too much evidence to suggest otherwise.

My heart goes out to all the familes and friends who got caught up in the tragedy of 9/11, to those who died during the attacks, and to those who died or got sick from the dust while rescuing others. Please take a moment to remember the firefighters and all the emergency response personnel who were at the scene and who gave their lives to save others.

I will take a moment also to remember all of the service men and woman who have died fighting in foreign wars in the name of 9/11. These wars were meant to protect our freedoms, and yet we have lost almost all of them at home since. I would like to thank all the brave men and women who have come forward with information regarding what really happened on 9/11. I will do all that I can to spread the word of liberty, to honor those who died, so that we can live fuller lives and help prevent further bloodshed, so that we can all return to living in relative peace again.